|
|
Money-laundering has been in the news
recently and tragic events in the USA will ensure the story
continues to run
Now, I don't want to get into any arguments about whether
the existing laws are too lax or whether they infringe our
civil liberties or human rights.
I feel there can be no argument that all professionals
dealing with finances should act to minimise the risk of
money-laundering
In my travels I've seen extremes of money-laundering
awareness.
In one practice, the new-client procedure includes the
completion of an 11-page form. No work may be done on the
client until the 'money-laundering partner' has reviewed and
signed the form.
This process causes a constant headache, as some of the
practice's partners are desperate to charge time bill their
clients as soon as possible after engagement.
However, the money-laundering rules are adhered to above all
others and all partners and staff have been educated to
understand the position.
In another practice (unfortunately fairly typically) they
have no money-laundering procedures at all. They claim most
of their new clients are British, so the problem doesn't
arise. (I'm not sure whether they perceive money-laundering
to be solely an overseas concern, or whether they feel that
the integrity of a British person is unquestionable.) They
add that, even if they did have money-laundering procedures,
they would simply slow down the business and they'd never
find the time to complete them anyway.
How can there be such a gulf?
In order to comply with the requirements of our regulators,
insurers, commentators and partners, we have to follow a
straightforward linear process. Pragmatic use of a decent
practice management or customer relationship management
system will ensure that the process may be completed and
recorded as quickly and simply as possible.
We can then get on with business - from providing the
services through to collecting the cash.
Talk to
Cynare for impartial
advice. |
|
|